You know whats interesting? Out of the two hairs found in the car only one had enough root to perform a DNA match which did match but police waited to arrest Patricia until a highly advanced and accurate match could be made, which took a year. Pat will spend the rest of her natural life in prison where people like her belong. Thats not proof theyre right but its more likely that you as one person are wrong. And Patricia did live in another state. Then 31 years old, she had lived a rocky existence. It was just assumed to be crib death. And this was never disclosed to Rorrers Defence. There is pendency of DNA investigation for Routier. Had he for some reason been murderously angry with, or bitter towards, Mrs K, why kill his baby? I have worked for Interpol for years as a gun analyst, usually women who commit such crimes against their exes wife or mistress, lover etc are pushed from behind by a man and promises and lies. Its not logical to say we know the truth unless we seen it for ourselves. Joanne didnt go missing until December 15, an entire week and a day later. Patricias professional life included short-lived gigs as a Century 21 real estate agent and an Oldsmobile salesperson. They really need to set her free and open the case and look at the husband. She never had anyone testify against her but an ex-boyfriend! I believe this woman murdered Joann and Alex. If that really is the case, the husbands alibi for a date months before becomes irrelevant. With Joann Katrinak, Alex Katrinak, Patricia Rorrer. Its never been made clear. because theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. Police slowly built a case against Patricia. THESE COPS ARE WRONG AND THEY ALL SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR WHAT THEY DID TO PATRICA, PUTTING HER AWAY FOR LIFE FOR SOMETHING SHE DID NOT DO. Too many people testified as to the type of person she was. Stop defending her when she is guilty!!!!! I have been following this case for a very long time, watching nearly all the available documentaries and have also read the book, Convenient Suspect, by Tammy Mal as well as acquiring a great deal of information which has emerged since the trial with regard to this case. The difference between the cases was that the child was not injured and the individual wrote down the details of the plan in a notebook, but otherwise it seems extremely similar to me. Unfortunately, most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense, and theyre only more unlikely to do so, given todays social media. Someone had shot Joann in the face with a .22-caliber pistol, then beaten her about the head hitting her 19 times in all with a blunt object. And dance instructor William Jarrett couldnt remember whether she attended his dance class at the club the night of Joanns disappearance. Search is on. She is 100% guilty seen 2 programs on this awful murder and read about it as well. Shes just extremely happy with Andy, her brother, Michael OConnor, told the media. And even prosecutor Michael McIntyre, who wrote the book Hair Trigger about the case, acknowledged to Keith Morrison that it was a little odd that the police found blood on the hairs in Joanns car but nowhere else in the vehicle. If Patricia had injuries it wouldve only been to her hands and she wasnt questioned right away which is also the reason she took Joanne elsewhere to kill her so her body wouldnt be found for a while and she would have time to return home. Hair we go. she didnt need to . Nobody said bodies were intact. I expect she will admit it one day. She should have received the death penalty imo. Rorrers filed multiple appeals over issues you raise, the latest recently and rejected. I dont even know its Christmas.. Finally, another irony you fail to appreciate: you claim theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. And Andrews explanation of how the intruder got in through the basement door seemed contrived, according to Grube, who gave an interview to Wrong Man, a 2020 true-crime docuseries from the Starz network, which produced two episodes called The Hang Up about the Rorrer case. . PS Speculative lies is meaningless. (Disclaimer: Im not a big fan of eyewitnesses who come forward years after the fact, but its possible). Some two years into the investigation of Rorrer, a court order was obtained to remove hair specimens from her. She likely SUFFOCATED him to get revenge on the babys father who was planning on leaving her. Your assertion that most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense is in fact nonsense the reality is that most people are easily fooled by these biased documentaries who then feel its okay to spout their tripe as if its the gospel. One of the hairs had magically developed root material to enable that. . She should have been treated exactly the way she treated that mother and baby, taken out into the woods, shot, beaten and then left to die. And your appraisal of McIntyre is 100% spot on. Thats because they knew it was a stretch to make anyone believe she would still be so enraged a week and a day later that she jumped into a van and drove 550 miles to kill a woman and baby she never met. I find it weird that youre going to kill a woman just because she hung up on you and maybe tell you some shitty world because you call like an ex. After one bullet didnt kill Joann, the gun locked up, so Patricia had to beat her to death, according to the prosecution. After relocating to Pennsylvania, Patricia met the 6-foot-2-inch Andrew in a restaurant. This is untrue. Wouldnt that verify Troutmans claim that the husband was arguing with the victim, in a rage? Im sure shes innocent adds nothing other than to tell us your state of mind! (We didnt get into the specifics.). And then there are documentaries (video and audio) which, by all accounts, stick to the facts and make a compelling case for her innocence. Now retired, he declined ForensicFilesNow.coms invitation to spar directly with Patricia via a podcast. Docket at pp. Well, at least you managed some sense there when you say that, especially when you take into account the amount of evidence and witnesses which were withheld from the Defence and what appears to be a clear case of evidence-tampering. Patricias phone bill showed no record of a call to Catasauqua that day, but police noticed she didnt make any calls at all from her house in North Carolina that day either suggesting she could have been out of state and used a pay phone to dial up the Katrinaks. Unbloody vehicle. And the obvious answer is Ill tell you why (which really is common knowledge). I can't believe this bitch has a whole internet community rallying for her; have they SEEN the evidence? It is not necessary to the case against her that she owned the killing gun (and it would be foolish to have used it). Let me simplify this for you in religion, one is taught there is a God. No other suspect has existed that would have a motive to kill Joann. Stevie J Further to my previous comment, I should add the following. Re Routier, the claim that she inflicted a potentially fatal injury on herself by no means indicates another perp: she could have inflicted it in ignorance, as a suicide attempt, or in a semi-psychotic state. Rorrer has appealed her conviction several times and her supporters believe additional DNA. Prosecution leader McIntyre, when interviewed, laughingly dismissed him as a nut in an effort to trivialise Traupmans input. so then using your contention, one who is deeply religious and sees God as being a factual figure is wrong? Highly charged case. First it was winter, cold temperatures preserve bodies for significantly longer periods. The Free Patricia Rorrer page points to a sliver of a fingernail found at the murder site that didnt come from either Patricia or Joann. She said that shes no fan of Forensic Files and that the show had many misrepresentations about her case and that shed heard ForensicFilesNow.com mixed up some facts as well. Interesting points thanks for writing in (and, yikes, those poor deer that starve to death). Angry that Joann hung up on her, she stalked her for three days, then broke into her basement and cut the phone line, put a gun to Joanns head as she was placing Alex in the car, and forced her to drive to the rural area. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. Advocates for her innocence complain of hype surrounding the case. It wasnt aimed at any one video producer. Meanwhile, interest in Patricias plight continues on social media. This is all BS.She did it. Lehigh Cty.) Still, no good leads materialized. It was a really perfect day with cloudless sky and temperature at about 20 C. I expected to be riding the local transportation a lot since my wife is not. After her arraignment, she had to walk past a crowd of dozens of locals screeching hang her! and baby killer! Patricia clung to a Polaroid picture showing her and her own little girl. They allege that the North Carolina resident stealthily drove 500 miles to Pennsylvania and killed out of a sense of deadly indignation. Everyone lies. They depict scenes which are pure speculation or exaggeration or present scenes, which in fact were only theories mentioned at her trial. Which Patricia did not, so who is the real killer? Men who murder are conventional, women are sensational, posits the Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Network. Interesting thought about the alibi timing. Patricia Rorrer: The Hang Up: Directed by Joe Berlinger, Catharine Park. Of course, if he had info that only the perp would know Admission has long since been disregarded without corroborative evidence. Patricia has been wrongfully convicted of murdering Joann and Alex Katrinak in 1994. I didnt read anything in this article that convinced me I didnt like that the lab had a bad rep and I do agree the police lie and frame people sometimes so I cant say 100% she did it or not. New state, new man. Justice is about uncovering the truth. Unless theres a complicity between him and her, and the reason she didnt divulge it is because she hopes to put all the blame on him, when she was the one to murder and he was a planner. From what Ive seen its pretty obvious Patricia did do that to this poor woman and the baby. Aside from the hair, there was almost zero forensic evidence. Nope. February 8, 2020. She was also accused of breaking into barns, stealing horses, and underfeeding the ones she owned. So, if you feel you have to be critical of me, you should also bear in mind those hate-mongers and perhaps have a word with them too. The organization purports that if there were awards for distorted reporting, the Morning Callwould win high honors.. Instead of presenting hard facts, all I see are words and phrases that are purely speculative.. such as perhaps. If not, how could Andrew have obtained samples of Patricias hair if they apparently didnt meet up in person after Andrews marriage? I certainly dont consider its more likely the victims husbands the perp than Rorrer, as has been suggested, leaving Rorrer or a stranger. I agree that the putative motive is relatively weak (though motive is ultimately subjective and theres no accounting for anger, bitterness, jealousy etc) and to convict on that substantially would be absurd. Theres also the matter of a woman who suddenly remembered she saw Joann with another man at a Food Mart store five days after the disappearance. This article seems to have a great many errors and omissions, more by design, I fancy, than a need to tell the story objectively. On Alexs diaper bag, police found strands of the same type of hair from the car. This was the reality for 58-year-old Patricia Rorrer, who is currently serving life in prison at Muncy State Correctional Institution (SCI) in Pennsylvania. I hope she suffers and goes insane from loneliness. After Joann Katrinak, the wife of Patricias former flame, turned up dead along with her infant son, prosecutors suspected Patricia. Andy did end up moving to Colorado with her and the last time I checked, they were still together. The author that wrote the book on the Rutier case donates all the funds from that book to freeing Darlie Routier because the jury wasnt shown a lot of evidence of the medical issues Darlie suffered. Just saying. So much of it, it would take all day to elaborate here. In a million years, she wouldnt do anything to harm that.. If I see anything that offers a differing opinion or is inaccurate, I think its entirely fair I should say my piece. Dont even think about arguing with me until they DNA test that hair and the broken fingernail found on her body; Ill just laugh at you. Stop. She had money put aside. Great catch. They retested hair from the car in 2008 with updated new technology. I therefore, perhaps naively, default to the judicial systems eventually getting the decision right.
Dean Middle School Football,
Marriott Stanton South Beach Room Service Menu,
Lewd Words 5 Letters Starting With S,
Interaction Of Science, Technology And Society,
Hire A Mascot Entertainer,
Articles P